Irina Andreea Micu assisted and represented Romanian and foreign clients in civil law litigations, IP dispute resolution cases especially in connection with trademarks, patents, intellectual property and other related rights.

She was active in competition law cases, assisting clients in the investigations carried out by the Competition Council in various industries with regard to alleged beaches of competition law rules (e.g. cartels, abuse of dominant position, economic concentrations etc.) and rendered legal assistance in various projects that generated competition law issues.

Irina Andreea Micu assisted and represented clients before the local and international arbitration courts (ICC Paris).

• 28/11/2019

  Cătălina Dicu (Senior Partner) and Geanina Barbu (Associate) analyze in the article the legal pitfalls of the draft law for amending the Law on payment in kind no. 77/2016. The project was intended to limit the right of appreciation of the court on unforeseen conditions, by instituting unforeseen legal presumptions.
  The whole material (in Romanian) can be read here.

• 21/11/2019

  Rareș Răducanu (Senior Partner) and Irina Titorian (Junior Lawyer) analyze the consequences of the practice of the national courts in the matter of requests for suspending the execution of administrative acts, which tends to absolve the presumption of legality of the administrative act, to the detriment of the particular interest.
  The whole material (in Romanian) can be read here.

• 14/11/2019

  In the article published on the Hotnews.ro portal, Laura Elena Radu (Senior Partner) and Marius Chelaru (Managing Associates) analyze the legal consequences of the Decision no. 45/2019 ruled by the High Court of Cassation and Justice in relation to the measures for completing the process of restitution, in kind or by equivalent, of the buildings taken abusively during the communist regime in Romania.
  The whole material (in Romanian) can be read here.

• 06/11/2019

  Dragoș Bogdan (Senior Partner) and Mihai Stănescu (Managing Associate) analyze the context in which the Constitutional Court opposed the assault on the giving in payment law, declaring the changes unconstitutional and clarifying the notification procedure. The whole material (in Romanian) can be read here.

• <<
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10
• 11
• 12
• 13
• 14
• 15
• 16
• 17
• 18
• 19
• 20
• 21
• 22
• 23
• 24
• 25
• 26
• 27
• 28
• 29
• 30
• 31
• 32
• 33
• 34
• 35
• 36
• 37
• 38
• 39
• 40
• 41
• 42
• 43
• 44
• 45
• 46
• 47
• 48
• 49
• 50
• 51
• 52
• 53
• 54
• 55
• 56
• 57
• 58
• 59
• 60
• 61
• 62
• 63
• 64
• 65
• 66
• 67
• 68
• >>